To eradicate poverty , there should be no multy parties because decisions cannot be made due to hung assembly and hung parliament

One of these days someone will actually believe me when I say that my advocacy of ownership in created identifiable and discretely separable objects that are one entity with multiple hosts has fuck-all to do with what the French Court, the Congress of the United States and its Librarians, and fascistic state-made corporations like Monsanto have to do with real rights to control the private property one brings into existence.

I am off to my draft board now.

We can say, “Look how messed up left and right is, we’re the un-political cola.” OK, we wouldn’t say that exactly, but my meaning should be as clear as 7-up. You Know That! Or not.

Anyway, everything old is new again, so we can pitch classical liberal/libertarian market anarchy as a cool steampunk re-invention. The watchful dragons of people’s belief systems jealously guard the confused “left” and “right” notions people embrace, even if different from each other. New words need are needed for the new wine flasks.

So how about that future prepping talk? Up for it?

Kent, I think you meant to say, “That they are hankering to have the word “Left” used to describe libertarians”. That is just crazy. It flies in the face of all history that has clearly designated extreme left as total governmental control, and moves toward the right as a move toward anarchy and a move away from the left.

It also denies Dr. Rothbard’s first observations, in two separate articles.[And many others that preceded Rothbard.] In The Transformation of the American Right, first published in Continuum, Summer 1964, pp. 220–231. Murray Rothbard correctly observed, “The modern American Right began, in the 1930’s and 1940’s, as a reaction against the New Deal and the Roosevelt Revolution, and specifically as an opposition to the critical increase of statism and state intervention… According to Dr. Rothbard, left/right measures the increases in governmental power, especially the power to intervene into the daily lives of individuals and businesses.

A reinforcement of this concept is found in “Confessions of a Right-Wing Liberal” published in 1969, Rothbard further observed: “…we adopted the standard view, let me repeat “…we adopted the standard view, of the political spectrum: “left,” meant socialism, or total power of the state; the further ‘right’ one went the less government one favored. Hence, we called ourselves “extreme rightists.”

Additional confirmation, farther along in the same article Rothbard said, “Originally, our historical heroes were such men as [Thomas] Jefferson, [Thomas] Paine, [John]Cobden and [Richard] Bright and [Herbert] Spencer. As our views became purer and more consistent, we eagerly embraced such near-anarchists as the voluntarist, Auberon Herbert, and the American individualist-anarchists, Lysander Spooner and Benjamin R. Tucker.”

In other words as they became “purer” and more “consistent” in their Libertarians thinking, there heroes were chosen from men that were closer to anarchy and 0% government on the right end of the Political Spectrum, that Dr. Rothbard called the standard view.

You said, “The current usage is what it is…” There is no current established usage. The meanings of “left ” and “right” are in a state of flux. Please note how often when a person uses the terms “left” and “right” they often throw in a clarifier IE “Left-Wing Liberals” or “the religious or radical right” . “…and the 1% of us hardcore types aren’t changing it ever…” This is the perfect time to exert our influence on the language, by inserting our own clarifiers, “big-government liberals” as leftist and “small-government Conservatives” as rightist. This makes liberals that are anti big government our allies, and big-government conservatives our opposition.

You said, “…especially when what is to be changed is disputed within our tiny sub-subset of the libertarian quadrant.”

Let me ask you, when I said. “You knew that” did you know it? Or better what percentage of the times I ask did you know it?

Kent, did you know that the three names by which we identify ourselves say that right is an advocate of less government, and what of my challenge? What is the forth word that means right as an advocate of small government?

But as Dennis Miller would say, “That’s just my opinion. I could be wrong.”

It would be for the Karl Hess Community Technology Forum’s next meeting after my August 29 talk on ham radio vs. the internet kill switch. We tend to have those irregularly scheduled meetings on the 5th Monday (when it exists) of the month (adjusting for major holidays).

Would you be willing to do that, Mr. McGlawn? If so, we’ll come up with the calendar date and announce it as an upcoming event.

‘Here is some “Light” reading to win my bet. Feel free to post it on your website if you like.’

My write-up of your 2009 talk covers my position. In the U.S., your usage of Left and Right is common. In Europe, not so much.

There are libertarians who are just as adamant as you (SEK3 and some folks at Mises), but hankering to take over the term “Left.” The current usage is what it is, and the 1% of us hardcore types aren’t changing it ever, especially when what is to be changed is disputed within our tiny sub-subset of the libertarian quadrant.

But as Dennis Miller would say, “That’s just my opinion. I could be wrong.”

I can defend my position, can you defend yours?

73 Dave NM0S

Sub: Lower demand values in real estate

This is to inform that the worldbank organisation is caring all the developing and underdeveloped countries by giving credit loans in the long term period.

India has got independence in 1947 at midnight but the country citizens are poor till yet due to corruption in the politics , Government , business corporates.

To remove poverty in india only solution is to lower demand values in urban and rural real estate, fee structure should be common in private schools and colleges, lower the demand values of fees in corporate hospitals.

The above reasons to be resolve . Every indian citizen should care earth and people helping people. The world is going to be face natural disaster in 2013 due to asteroids hitting the earth. This is genuine message with proof of NASA and earth in danger websites.

India is a multy party system thereby politicians are making states to be form smaller states for eg: Andhra pradesh should be divided into two states by making telengana seperate state. There is no particular reason to form Telangana because Citizens are same community with caste ,creed and religion.

India has constitution pattern of your London government , Indian constitution has Right to property but eliminated . This government order is pending in the parliament. The world bank should put pressure to implement Right to property. This will resolve every problem in india.

This is for your information to resolve above problems india.