<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Right Fight for the Right?</title>
	<link>http://permakent.com/2009/08/21/the-right-fight-for-the-right/</link>
	<description>Building relationships between people and with nature.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://permakent.com/2009/08/21/the-right-fight-for-the-right/#comment-9924</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael R. Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://permakent.com/2009/08/21/the-right-fight-for-the-right/#comment-9924</guid>
		<description>"If by some miracle we could control the language of the political spectrum, I’d suggest using “up” for freedom (as in free floating, like in a balloon, in space or heaven) and “down” for the hellish nightmare of tyranny and statism. This is in accord with the so-called Nolan chart already used by the L.P."

I like this terminology. In particular, it allows constructions like "Upper Left" and "Lower Right", as well as hairsplitting constructions like "Upper Middle" and even "Middle Right".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If by some miracle we could control the language of the political spectrum, I’d suggest using “up” for freedom (as in free floating, like in a balloon, in space or heaven) and “down” for the hellish nightmare of tyranny and statism. This is in accord with the so-called Nolan chart already used by the L.P.&#8221;</p>
<p>I like this terminology. In particular, it allows constructions like &#8220;Upper Left&#8221; and &#8220;Lower Right&#8221;, as well as hairsplitting constructions like &#8220;Upper Middle&#8221; and even &#8220;Middle Right&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
